|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 26, 2020 8:12:42 GMT -7
Fairly recently we have acquired a wonderful old Husqvarna rifle chambered for a much overlooked but immensely capable cartridge the 9.3x57 mm Mauser cartridge. We acquired this handsome lightweight fast handling Euro style rifle with the specific intension of expanding our reach into the so far neglected caliber in both loaded ammo and available bullets.
After we thoroughly delve into the shorter 9.3x57 we have a very good Mauser mod 98 action available for barreling to the longer 9.3x62mm chambering with the same end goal to offer bullets, load data for our bullets and loaded ammo using our bullets in the two chamberings.
To date we have woefully neglected this caliber offering only one bullet design a 280gn round nose gas checked design acquired from Walt Melander a couple decades ago now. This has been a wonderfully accurate bullets from the several rifles we tried it in but in a round nose configuration leaves something to be desired as a hunting bullet.
We underwent some testing using 35 caliber bullets paper patched and these proved capable of fine accuracy but presented problems for field use in that the nose section of 35 caliber bullets are smaller in diameter than for 9.3mm so there is no land contact for guidance to the bores center as well as the issue of the forward part of the paper patch on the bullet being a loose fit so susceptible to damage when feeding from the magazine. Its was a good idea but in practice not quite right.
We have a friend that does all the MT. gun shows and he knows I am always interested in odd or different molds he may acquire at a show. A couple years ago he picked up a treasure chest of molds he brought to my house and on a pleasant Sunday afternoon we dickered, bartered, and otherwise horse traded his goods for items of interest to him in my possession at the time.
One of the treasures in that box was a Tom Ballard mold for an adjustable weight smooth sided, cup based, slightly tapered spitzer type bullet with a small meplate from being a nose pour design. Until very recently I have been using this mold that drops a bullet of .366" diameter at its base to paper patch to 375 caliber and it has been working most excellent in that regard. I used it in a 375 Whelen to fill a deer -B tag last year and for that task it performed admirably. More recently I have tried powder coating it for 9.3mm caliber but it did not work out as I had hoped. The issue with PC is one of bullet alloy hardness. What I discovered was that with an alloy soft enough to expand velocity was very limited but is alloy hardness was increased to allow full or near full potential velocity the spitzer shaped bullets would not expand at all so a poor choice as a deer hunting bullet deer hunting being the purpose of the 9.3mm bullet adventure.
Even more recently I was inclined to try paper patching these bullets for 9.3mm. When patching for 375 caliber I use a 25LB 100% cotton fiber bond paper the 25LB paper being several thousandths thick and needed to fill in from the .366" bullet diameter to the .377" finished diameter I size to for 375 caliber. Now here was the trick in switching to the smaller 9.3mm caliber which is to go to a 9LB paper also known as onion skin of the same 100% cotton fiber construction. With a double wrap of 9LB paper bullets easily pass through the .368" die we size to for the 9.3mm caliber.
Now as they say we are cooking with gas! The paper patch completely eliminates the alloy hardness issue with its velocity restrictions. Now even a very soft alloy can be pushed to the velocity limits of the cartridge. There are some practical limits though as too soft an alloy at too high a velocity can be extremely destructive and ruin otherwise edible meat. I learned this the hard way in my trials with hard cast soft nose bullets where I ran half the length of a 400gn 40 caliber bullet in pure soft lead in the nose and the base half quenched to very hard to withstand full velocity loads of 2100 fps from the 405 wcf. The result was two ruined shoulders on a fork horn bull moose.
Anyway for the potential velocity of the 9.3x57 an alloy hardness of BHN 12 to 15 will be about right. My formula for expansion is BHN x 100 = impact velocity so with hardness in this range will still give expansion at the reduced impact velocities of shots to about 300 yards.
An accuracy trial in our Husky rifle yesterday with a bullet alloy at about BHN-12 gave excellent results fired at 50 yards. Our rifle has a Weaver variable scope mounted that is from 1 to 3 power so even at 3x at 100 yards the bull is pretty small so we used 50 yards for a more precise aim with the quite heavy cross hairs in this scope
So the PP project is working out well but wanting a selection of bullet designs greater than two and knowing the terminal abilities of a non expanding wide flat nose bullet design I decided to progress in that direction as well. Using the enjoyable design feature at Dan Lynch's Mountain Mold site we have designed just such a bullet. This bullet should come in at about 280gn in clip on wheel weights. I felt the 280gn weight important because most available load data for all 9.3mm cartridges will center around this weight and most folks want published load data.
We do not yet have this mold in hand but should soon. I designed it with what Walt Melander called his modern design with a single wide lube groove and fairly long nose but short bore ride section and having a 70% meplate should smack deer with some authority. Anyway that wide flat nose bullet should be in our near future offerings in 9.3mm caliber.
I am really enjoying shooting this wonderful old Husqvarna rifle and imagine Lord willing it will be used with one of our two new offerings in 9.3mm to fill some of our deer tags for the 2020 season.
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 26, 2020 8:31:37 GMT -7
I am sorry but only half of this post published. I spent a long time on it but it seems lost. I am too tired to try again now so hope to refinish later. Sorry! Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 26, 2020 9:18:05 GMT -7
I can hear your pain my Brother.
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 26, 2020 9:41:54 GMT -7
Re-reading through the post I see it is all there but is out of sequence. What happened was about half way through the post I published it because at times in the past my computer has blinked away entire long posts before they were published. I thought I would make sure I wouldn't loose the first half by publishing it then add the second half by editing. Apparently the edit was added but out of sequence somewhere in the middle. It is a little hard to follow this way but for fear of loosing it all together I will not mess!!! Such is the free web site world, worth every cent paid for it. Anyway hope you all feel enriched after reading it.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 27, 2020 6:27:53 GMT -7
I have the same issue to often. My jab here and there must cross the frontier of key board patience. And for the last 3 months my botto row of letters works off and on so I have go back and try to insert those missing letters. Jabbing letter "M" 14 ties to get one in gets to y jabbers.
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 27, 2020 13:10:40 GMT -7
Ah sweet success! I sucked it up and found the courage to attempt to reorganize the post in its intended sequence. It is much easier to follow now. Sorry for the original confusion. No its not senility!!! or maybe--- oh never mind
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jun 27, 2020 13:20:25 GMT -7
ooooooooooooooo...........the 9.3mm...........ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh(sorry about the drool) i have a 9.3x57 in a husqvarna m46 with 280gr rn gc(thanks dan!!!) and imr4895(can't remember how many grains?). i am going to use Forster hollow point, either 1/16 or 1/8" bit, on my Forster case trimmer . then i'll take them out to hunt deer. the boolits are .368" and 15bhn. the bottom left is 100 yards/bench. the middle i was trying to sight it in. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 27, 2020 15:49:38 GMT -7
Dang them rifles just shoot good don't they!!! With the load I shot the other day using the 310gn paper patch I didn't do any load development at all. I just slightly reduced the load for the 280gn bullet and the results were all I could ask for. The same bullet didn't shoot as well powder coated so I have given up on that. I am anxiously awaiting the new mountain Mold with the 280gn wide flat nose. I imagine a sample will head your way. Everything you read about the 9.3x57 says its a great moose cartridge and is mostly used for that purpose in Scandinavia but for the most part factory bullets are too heavily constructed for smaller deer so terminal performance is not that great with factory ammo when used on small deer. That's why we are trying to develop bullets and loads that will work good on small deer and by small deer I mean WT deer. There has been quite a number of these Husqvarna rifles in 9.3x57 imported into the USA as well as in the 9.3x62 chambering. A testament to that fact is that in less than 24 hours of listing the 310gn PP bullets on the GB auctions they were selling. In ballisticaly similar domestic offerings as in the 358 Win and 35 Whelen there has been no neglect in acceptance as these are now readily available in available rifles and factory ammunition. In each match up the 9.3mm offering will slightly outperform its 35 caliber near twin. Why then have the 9.3mm chamberings been so over looked? I think I answered that question in the previous sentence, AVAILABILITY OF GUNS AND AMMO. Winchester didn't make them or Remington, Ruger, Savage or any domestic rifle makers. Ammo for the 9.3x57 is so easy to make. Just a simple neck up of readily available 8x57 brass and load away. The 9.3x62 is a bit more difficult in that there is no domestically available case to form it from. It can be formed from 30-06 but the head diameter of 06 brass is a bit smaller in diameter so they will show a distinctive bulge at the point just ahead of the solid web when fired in a standard 9.3x62 mm chamber. I personally wouldn't us 06 brass for full power loads in a 9.3x62 . Maybe for light loads on the order of 38 special performance but nothing more. Maybe I am over cautious but I like my hide and have become attached to it. The good news there is that Privy brass is available in 9.3x62 at about the same cost as for new 30-06 brass so why bother. Now looking at your rifle I see you have a front extension ring. My rifle has a long pull and I wanted to set the scope back farther so bought dual extension rings but too late discovered my folly. I found I could only use the front extension ring as the rear extension interfered with the bolt lift. I always say every lesson learned in life is paid for in blood, sweat, or tears. This one was only a little sweat
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 27, 2020 16:04:05 GMT -7
Dan Could your bolt be bent down a bit more to clear the scope with the rear extension in place ?
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 27, 2020 16:07:40 GMT -7
No the contact is right at the root of the bolt handle. The front extension helped and a dual slot front base helped even more.
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jun 27, 2020 20:45:10 GMT -7
the 286gr prvi sp and the 232gr norma sp(i don't have it) are really good for deer. the jacket thickness is next to none, esp the prvi. i use 8x57 prvi brass with the 9.3x57 hornady dies. i use pure lanolin and a q tip to neck up the 8x57 to 9.3. the 9.3×57 are fire formed and they are 2.220″ overall length , an actual oal 9.3×57 is 2.240″. . the nice thing is i don’t have to trim the cases!!!!lol the 9.3x57 norma brass is $35/25pcs while the 8x57 prvi brass is $28/50pcs, i'll take prvi every time and twicet on sunday. they do shoot good, don't they!!!!! i did the load development(ahem ) but they all came out the same group size!!! so i decided on what was best on my shoulder and not velocity gained. i went to my book and 280gr rn gc with 39.0gr of imr4895 is the load. i have to set my chrony but they'll probably be 1700-1800fps. also my load development goes 36.0, 37.0, 38.0, 39.0 and 40.0grs of imr4895, i should have done 1/2gr but.......i was lazy.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 28, 2020 6:54:15 GMT -7
With rifles using brass about 308 and larger we use one grain ladder climb. But once we see which load proves the best we do a 1/2 grain up and down to confirm things. Smaller brass gets 1/2 grain ladder Tiny (32-20 and so) gets .2 grain ladder at the start...........
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jun 28, 2020 11:54:28 GMT -7
With rifles using brass about 308 and larger we use one grain ladder climb. But once we see which load proves the best we do a 1/2 grain up and down to confirm things. Smaller brass gets 1/2 grain ladder Tiny (32-20 and so) gets .2 grain ladder at the start........... i usually do 1/2 grain on my large brass, usually!!! small brass (20 vartarg) is .2 grains. i used to do this because i "demanded" the cartridge/rifle was 1/2" or less at 100 yards. i wasn't a competition shooter, i only competed by myself. nowadays, if the rifle goes 3" at 100 yards (3 or 5 shots/bench) i am happy and i will hunt with it. the only cartridge that "demands" accuracy is the 20 vartarg. i can do 1/2"+/- at 100 yards(5 shots/bench) with my sloppy reloads. it can do .1 - .2" at 100 yards(5 or 10 shots/bench) with careful handloads. measuring brass weight to .1gr, trim each individual brass to exactly same size, inside neck has to be same, bullet weight has to same.........ugh, i used to do this every time!!! i am thankful that i had a stroke, because i was bent on having one hole for ten shots!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 28, 2020 12:20:12 GMT -7
Some very small cartridges like our 22 Cooper, 22 squirrel and even when your near top end in the 22 hornet require .1gn increment changes and can go from normal to popped primers in a .1gn increase.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 28, 2020 13:12:19 GMT -7
So far our 22 Hornet is only run about 80% I have no need for more as it is one of my walking rifles down in the bottoms. Farthest shot so far was under 25 yards. Just cannot see ground hog / racoons farther than that. And the rifle is a fine old Austrian or German tip up that I sure do not want to hurt. Was a bring back by a GI that kindly came my way.
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jun 29, 2020 10:14:44 GMT -7
the 22 hornet is on my wait list. it will be either a cz 527 or i will build a bolt rifle(my gunsmith) it.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 29, 2020 11:22:45 GMT -7
Does anyone make a top break in 22 Hornet ?
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 29, 2020 11:33:28 GMT -7
Thompson Canter in the TCR rifle, the Contender rifle and pistol, and the Encore rifle and pistol.
|
|
|
Post by shootist---Gary on Jun 29, 2020 11:52:46 GMT -7
Todd, you could have fooled everyone to thinking all ten went in the same hole, by loading 1 live round, followed by 9 blanks.
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jun 29, 2020 14:13:33 GMT -7
Gary I am shocked at this shameful display of character or lack thereof. BTW what is your procedure for loading blanks ? Asking for a friend.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Jun 29, 2020 15:15:59 GMT -7
Thanks Dan So far all I could find are the Rugers
|
|
|
Post by shootist---Gary on Jun 29, 2020 18:40:41 GMT -7
Hi Daniel. I couldn't find a smiley face to go with my comment. I haven't loaded any blanks for years. I did do some using paraffin over a very low powder charge for a .45 Colt SAA, just to play around with on horseback back in the 1960's. In my old 1858 Remington .44 C & b pistol, about 20 or so gr. of 3f, with kleenex wadded up & rammed on top of the powder charge, as it turned into confetti, & wouldn't hurt anyone. We were in a Civil War reenactment cavalry outfit. I carried extra powder charges measured out & put in small pill bottles kept in my shirt pockets. kleenex was kept under my belt buckle, & when I had to reload during a charge, bit a chunk off, squeezed it into a small glob, rammed it onto the powder, put a cap on, fire 1 shot, & do it all over again, as I didn't have enough time to load more at a gallop.
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jun 29, 2020 19:00:04 GMT -7
Todd, you could have fooled everyone to thinking all ten went in the same hole, by loading 1 live round, followed by 9 blanks. sonofagun, i never thought of that!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jul 11, 2020 11:07:20 GMT -7
We have received our custom design mold from Dan Lynch for the 275gn 9.3mm bullet. As usual excellent workmanship on the mold and as usual exactly what I wanted. Weight is spot on at 275gn. Diameter is .001" larger but within his specked .002" + or - This bullet was designed for hunting with a meplate of 70% of caliber. It has the frontal area combined with enough weight for enough momentum to maintain terminal velocity for wide and deep permanent wound channel. This is what Tod asked about some time back and now is. In my small ring Husqvarna 9.3x57 this bullet feeds flawlessly from the magazine when case mouths are crimped into the designed crimp groove. A wee bit of informal shooting yesterday indicates accuracy with this design is all that can be desired in such a wide flat nose hunting bullet. Now to recruit help in testing Tod if you wouldn't mind please PM me your address and I will get some of these as well as some of the 310gn paper patch to you for testing in your rifle. Will get Tina to add a pic shortly.
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Jul 11, 2020 16:23:05 GMT -7
pm sent
thank you very much
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Jul 11, 2020 17:53:20 GMT -7
pm sent thank you very much Got that my friend and will try to get a package headed your way Monday AM.
|
|
|
Post by todddoyka on Sept 23, 2020 12:53:21 GMT -7
i finally got around to shooting the new boolit(275gr fn gc), but here ya go- 275gr fn gc with imr4895 at 100 yards/benched........... they all shot great, except the 41.0gr (?). i thought i had made a good shot on ? but maybe not. maybe i pulled the gun or.......i don't know. the ? is all me, not the gun. but if i shot the deer( 1/3 way up, behind the shoulder), i'd still be eating venison. and i forgot my chrony...again, but it should be 1800+/-fps. i would say thank you dan, but i have to come up with the money to buy them. i figure a couple of months(disability) then i'll send it to the bull shop. recoil-wise, it didn't bother me. i could take the imr4895 up a grain or three, but why bother. the closest shot on a deer is around 20 yards and the furthest is around 150 yards. i average about 30-40 yards to take a deer, so............ i still have to fire pp and powdercoat boolits, but 275gr fn gc are fer me!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Sept 23, 2020 17:40:58 GMT -7
Me too , the more I shoot that one the more I like it. Hope to have some field report after hunting season. I kind of have an idea of what they will be, big holes through and through. I designed this bullet much like our 375gn 375 caliber bullet. With that one in a 375 Whelen I shot a large bull caribou. The shot was about maybe 80 yards the light was fading fast and I had iron sights so touched off the shot when the front bead was about centered on the shoulder on a broad side shot. The impact of the 375 cal with 70% meplate caused such a convulsive whip the bull threw off both antlers. The exit on the off side shoulder was a hard ball size hole. I expect about the same type performance with this new 9.3mm bullet at 275gn and a meplate of 70% of caliber.
|
|
|
Post by missionary on Sept 24, 2020 6:26:48 GMT -7
Those large FN bullets do surprising things on whatever they impact. Especially when cast of an appropriate mix that will expand some.
|
|
|
Post by Bullshop on Sept 24, 2020 8:05:01 GMT -7
I am going to ramble a little bit on the wounding capability of a heavy for caliber wide flat nose bullet. There are three functions involved in what the volume of the permanent wound channel will be with this type of non expanding projectile. Those things are #1 impact velocity, #2 meplate diameter, #3 terminal velocity. Lets look at each separately. #1 Impact velocity will determine the angle of displacement of tissue from the bullets meplate. The soft tissue being displaced acts as a high velocity hydraulic splashing outward from the meplate. The angle of the displacement is directly related to the impact velocity going from a 90* angle off the meplate with very high impact velocity then gradually decreasing in angle as the projectile decelerates and at some point as terminal velocity has slowed to a certain level becomes parallel to the bullet sides leaving a wound no larger in diameter than the bullet diameter. With the high velocity 90* angle displacement the wound will be many times larger in diameter than the bullet diameter.
#2 The meplate diameter determines how much soft tissue is being displaced in the bullets terminal travel. The greater the volume of displaced tissue the greater the hydraulic force around the bullet in its penetration. A greater volume of displaced soft tissue will equal a greater volume of the permanent wound channel. A greater volume of permanent wound channel will result in a more rapid drop in blood pressure as well as a greater volume of bleeding.
#3 Terminal velocity will determine the angle of displacement of soft tissue from the meplate for the entire length of the wound. As stated in #1 the projectile impact velocity determines the angle of displacement at impact but the bullet weight or momentum will determine how far into the wound the acute angle of displacement will carry. A lighter bullet weight will decelerate faster than a heavy for caliber weight. A more rapid deceleration in penetration will reduce the total volume of wound channel because the wound will taper in a shorter distance in its penetration. The heavier weight with greater momentum will maintain its terminal velocity to a greater depth of penetration there by creating a larger volume of permanent wound. The tremendous killing effect of non expanding bullets having a large meplate has the three points of meplate diameter, projectile weight, and velocity all working together to result in quick clean kills on game. This is the reason that when I design a cast bullet specifically for hunting and by hunting we are mostly referring to deer I want it to have that wide flat nose of around 70% of its diameter and enough weight for high terminal velocity retention. There will always be some compromise as to allowable meplate diameter and weight. A meplate too large in diameter limits the range and too high a weight for caliber limits the achievable muzzle velocity for any cartridge so in designing a bullet for hunting these things must be considered and applied. OK enough rambling for now as I am swamped with orders that need filled.
|
|